Tổng quan về seico

In high-tech agricultural projects, the challenge is not only about “designing a structure that is safe enough,” but also about optimizing investment costs, construction efficiency, and long-term operational performance.

The Challenge with the Initial Design. According to the original design proposal:

• The entire frame system used factory-welded steel structures
• The design followed an overly conservative safety approach
• Although the structure met load-bearing requirements, several limitations emerged:

Limitations of the previous consultant’s design solution

Problems Identified

• Excessive structural weight
• Heavy dependence on cranes and on-site welding
• High transportation and construction costs
• Difficult implementation in mountainous terrain and prolonged humid rainy conditions

Most importantly, the investor did not request a “complete redesign,” but instead raised a very practical question: “Is there a more optimized solution that still ensures safety and project schedule?”

Seico Reworked the Problem Together with the Client. Instead of maintaining the original approach, Seico’s engineering team worked closely with the client to reassess all real-world project conditions, including:

• Actual structural load forces
• Steel consumption volume
• Site construction conditions
• Weather and terrain characteristics
• Overall operational costs, not just material costs

Seico and the client re-evaluated the entire approach

Through this evaluation process, a more optimized solution was proposed. Seico switched to a lightweight steel truss frame system, optimized according to the project’s actual structural loads.

Key improvements included:

• Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual load calculations
• Replacing welded connections with bolted connections on site
• Assembling components at ground level instead of relying entirely on crane installation

Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual structural loads

This solution ensured all technical requirements while significantly improving construction flexibility.

Achieved Results: 

✔ 20% reduction in total structural frame weight: Directly reduced material costs and improved investment efficiency.

✔ Reduced dependence on lifting equipment: With lighter components, workers could manually handle and install many sections.

✔ More flexible construction under unfavorable weather conditions: Minimized on-site welding, especially suitable for long periods of humid and rainy weather.

✔ Optimized transportation costs: Compact and lightweight components increased truck loading efficiency and reduced the number of transport trips.

✔ Lower overall project costs: Not only were steel structure costs optimized, but construction, operation, and equipment support costs were also significantly reduced.

Reduced the total steel structure weight by 20%

Structural Optimization Is Not Just About Using Less Steel

An effective structural solution is not simply about “using fewer materials,” but about selecting the right solution that matches construction conditions, operational requirements, and real investment objectives. 

SEICO - True Steel - Complete Trust 

-------------------

SEICO STEEL

Website: http://seico.vn

 Email: hnsales@seico.vn

 YouTube: www.youtube.com/@SEICOJSC

 LinkedIn: SEICO JSC trên LinkedIn

In high-tech agricultural projects, the challenge is not only about “designing a structure that is safe enough,” but also about optimizing investment costs, construction efficiency, and long-term operational performance.

The Challenge with the Initial Design. According to the original design proposal:

• The entire frame system used factory-welded steel structures
• The design followed an overly conservative safety approach
• Although the structure met load-bearing requirements, several limitations emerged:

Limitations of the previous consultant’s design solution

Problems Identified

• Excessive structural weight
• Heavy dependence on cranes and on-site welding
• High transportation and construction costs
• Difficult implementation in mountainous terrain and prolonged humid rainy conditions

Most importantly, the investor did not request a “complete redesign,” but instead raised a very practical question: “Is there a more optimized solution that still ensures safety and project schedule?”

Seico Reworked the Problem Together with the Client. Instead of maintaining the original approach, Seico’s engineering team worked closely with the client to reassess all real-world project conditions, including:

• Actual structural load forces
• Steel consumption volume
• Site construction conditions
• Weather and terrain characteristics
• Overall operational costs, not just material costs

Seico and the client re-evaluated the entire approach

Through this evaluation process, a more optimized solution was proposed. Seico switched to a lightweight steel truss frame system, optimized according to the project’s actual structural loads.

Key improvements included:

• Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual load calculations
• Replacing welded connections with bolted connections on site
• Assembling components at ground level instead of relying entirely on crane installation

Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual structural loads

This solution ensured all technical requirements while significantly improving construction flexibility.

Achieved Results: 

✔ 20% reduction in total structural frame weight: Directly reduced material costs and improved investment efficiency.

✔ Reduced dependence on lifting equipment: With lighter components, workers could manually handle and install many sections.

✔ More flexible construction under unfavorable weather conditions: Minimized on-site welding, especially suitable for long periods of humid and rainy weather.

✔ Optimized transportation costs: Compact and lightweight components increased truck loading efficiency and reduced the number of transport trips.

✔ Lower overall project costs: Not only were steel structure costs optimized, but construction, operation, and equipment support costs were also significantly reduced.

Reduced the total steel structure weight by 20%

Structural Optimization Is Not Just About Using Less Steel

An effective structural solution is not simply about “using fewer materials,” but about selecting the right solution that matches construction conditions, operational requirements, and real investment objectives. 

SEICO - True Steel - Complete Trust 

-------------------

SEICO STEEL

Website: http://seico.vn

 Email: hnsales@seico.vn

 YouTube: www.youtube.com/@SEICOJSC

 LinkedIn: SEICO JSC trên LinkedIn

In high-tech agricultural projects, the challenge is not only about “designing a structure that is safe enough,” but also about optimizing investment costs, construction efficiency, and long-term operational performance.

The Challenge with the Initial Design. According to the original design proposal:

• The entire frame system used factory-welded steel structures
• The design followed an overly conservative safety approach
• Although the structure met load-bearing requirements, several limitations emerged:

Limitations of the previous consultant’s design solution

Problems Identified

• Excessive structural weight
• Heavy dependence on cranes and on-site welding
• High transportation and construction costs
• Difficult implementation in mountainous terrain and prolonged humid rainy conditions

Most importantly, the investor did not request a “complete redesign,” but instead raised a very practical question: “Is there a more optimized solution that still ensures safety and project schedule?”

Seico Reworked the Problem Together with the Client. Instead of maintaining the original approach, Seico’s engineering team worked closely with the client to reassess all real-world project conditions, including:

• Actual structural load forces
• Steel consumption volume
• Site construction conditions
• Weather and terrain characteristics
• Overall operational costs, not just material costs

Seico and the client re-evaluated the entire approach

Through this evaluation process, a more optimized solution was proposed. Seico switched to a lightweight steel truss frame system, optimized according to the project’s actual structural loads.

Key improvements included:

• Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual load calculations
• Replacing welded connections with bolted connections on site
• Assembling components at ground level instead of relying entirely on crane installation

Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual structural loads

This solution ensured all technical requirements while significantly improving construction flexibility.

Achieved Results: 

✔ 20% reduction in total structural frame weight: Directly reduced material costs and improved investment efficiency.

✔ Reduced dependence on lifting equipment: With lighter components, workers could manually handle and install many sections.

✔ More flexible construction under unfavorable weather conditions: Minimized on-site welding, especially suitable for long periods of humid and rainy weather.

✔ Optimized transportation costs: Compact and lightweight components increased truck loading efficiency and reduced the number of transport trips.

✔ Lower overall project costs: Not only were steel structure costs optimized, but construction, operation, and equipment support costs were also significantly reduced.

Reduced the total steel structure weight by 20%

Structural Optimization Is Not Just About Using Less Steel

An effective structural solution is not simply about “using fewer materials,” but about selecting the right solution that matches construction conditions, operational requirements, and real investment objectives. 

SEICO - True Steel - Complete Trust 

-------------------

SEICO STEEL

Website: http://seico.vn

 Email: hnsales@seico.vn

 YouTube: www.youtube.com/@SEICOJSC

 LinkedIn: SEICO JSC trên LinkedIn

In high-tech agricultural projects, the challenge is not only about “designing a structure that is safe enough,” but also about optimizing investment costs, construction efficiency, and long-term operational performance.

The Challenge with the Initial Design. According to the original design proposal:

• The entire frame system used factory-welded steel structures
• The design followed an overly conservative safety approach
• Although the structure met load-bearing requirements, several limitations emerged:

Limitations of the previous consultant’s design solution

Problems Identified

• Excessive structural weight
• Heavy dependence on cranes and on-site welding
• High transportation and construction costs
• Difficult implementation in mountainous terrain and prolonged humid rainy conditions

Most importantly, the investor did not request a “complete redesign,” but instead raised a very practical question: “Is there a more optimized solution that still ensures safety and project schedule?”

Seico Reworked the Problem Together with the Client. Instead of maintaining the original approach, Seico’s engineering team worked closely with the client to reassess all real-world project conditions, including:

• Actual structural load forces
• Steel consumption volume
• Site construction conditions
• Weather and terrain characteristics
• Overall operational costs, not just material costs

Seico and the client re-evaluated the entire approach

Through this evaluation process, a more optimized solution was proposed. Seico switched to a lightweight steel truss frame system, optimized according to the project’s actual structural loads.

Key improvements included:

• Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual load calculations
• Replacing welded connections with bolted connections on site
• Assembling components at ground level instead of relying entirely on crane installation

Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual structural loads

This solution ensured all technical requirements while significantly improving construction flexibility.

Achieved Results: 

✔ 20% reduction in total structural frame weight: Directly reduced material costs and improved investment efficiency.

✔ Reduced dependence on lifting equipment: With lighter components, workers could manually handle and install many sections.

✔ More flexible construction under unfavorable weather conditions: Minimized on-site welding, especially suitable for long periods of humid and rainy weather.

✔ Optimized transportation costs: Compact and lightweight components increased truck loading efficiency and reduced the number of transport trips.

✔ Lower overall project costs: Not only were steel structure costs optimized, but construction, operation, and equipment support costs were also significantly reduced.

Reduced the total steel structure weight by 20%

Structural Optimization Is Not Just About Using Less Steel

An effective structural solution is not simply about “using fewer materials,” but about selecting the right solution that matches construction conditions, operational requirements, and real investment objectives. 

SEICO - True Steel - Complete Trust 

-------------------

SEICO STEEL

Website: http://seico.vn

 Email: hnsales@seico.vn

 YouTube: www.youtube.com/@SEICOJSC

 LinkedIn: SEICO JSC trên LinkedIn

In high-tech agricultural projects, the challenge is not only about “designing a structure that is safe enough,” but also about optimizing investment costs, construction efficiency, and long-term operational performance.

The Challenge with the Initial Design. According to the original design proposal:

• The entire frame system used factory-welded steel structures
• The design followed an overly conservative safety approach
• Although the structure met load-bearing requirements, several limitations emerged:

Limitations of the previous consultant’s design solution

Problems Identified

• Excessive structural weight
• Heavy dependence on cranes and on-site welding
• High transportation and construction costs
• Difficult implementation in mountainous terrain and prolonged humid rainy conditions

Most importantly, the investor did not request a “complete redesign,” but instead raised a very practical question: “Is there a more optimized solution that still ensures safety and project schedule?”

Seico Reworked the Problem Together with the Client. Instead of maintaining the original approach, Seico’s engineering team worked closely with the client to reassess all real-world project conditions, including:

• Actual structural load forces
• Steel consumption volume
• Site construction conditions
• Weather and terrain characteristics
• Overall operational costs, not just material costs

Seico and the client re-evaluated the entire approach

Through this evaluation process, a more optimized solution was proposed. Seico switched to a lightweight steel truss frame system, optimized according to the project’s actual structural loads.

Key improvements included:

• Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual load calculations
• Replacing welded connections with bolted connections on site
• Assembling components at ground level instead of relying entirely on crane installation

Using lightweight steel trusses designed based on actual structural loads

This solution ensured all technical requirements while significantly improving construction flexibility.

Achieved Results: 

✔ 20% reduction in total structural frame weight: Directly reduced material costs and improved investment efficiency.

✔ Reduced dependence on lifting equipment: With lighter components, workers could manually handle and install many sections.

✔ More flexible construction under unfavorable weather conditions: Minimized on-site welding, especially suitable for long periods of humid and rainy weather.

✔ Optimized transportation costs: Compact and lightweight components increased truck loading efficiency and reduced the number of transport trips.

✔ Lower overall project costs: Not only were steel structure costs optimized, but construction, operation, and equipment support costs were also significantly reduced.

Reduced the total steel structure weight by 20%

Structural Optimization Is Not Just About Using Less Steel

An effective structural solution is not simply about “using fewer materials,” but about selecting the right solution that matches construction conditions, operational requirements, and real investment objectives. 

SEICO - True Steel - Complete Trust 

-------------------

SEICO STEEL

Website: http://seico.vn

 Email: hnsales@seico.vn

 YouTube: www.youtube.com/@SEICOJSC

 LinkedIn: SEICO JSC trên LinkedIn

Trong các dự án nông nghiệp công nghệ cao, bài toán đặt ra không chỉ nằm ở việc “thiết kế đủ an toàn”, mà còn phải tối ưu chi phí đầu tư, thi công và vận hành thực tế.

Bài toán từ phương án ban đầu. Theo phương án của đơn vị tư vấn thiết kế trước đó:

• Toàn bộ hệ khung sử dụng kết cấu thép hàn tại nhà máy
• Thiết kế theo hướng dư an toàn
• Tuy đảm bảo khả năng chịu lực nhưng phát sinh nhiều hạn chế:

Điểm hạn chế từ phương án của đơn vị tư vấn thiết kế trước đó

Những vấn đề gặp phải

• Trọng lượng kết cấu lớn
• Phụ thuộc nhiều vào cẩu lắp và hàn tại công trường
• Chi phí vận chuyển và thi công cao
• Khó triển khai trong điều kiện địa hình đồi núi, thời tiết mưa ẩm kéo dài

Điều đáng nói là chủ đầu tư không yêu cầu “thiết kế lại từ đầu”, mà đặt ra một câu hỏi rất thực tế: “Có giải pháp nào tối ưu hơn nhưng vẫn đảm bảo an toàn và tiến độ hay không?”

Seico cùng khách hàng “làm lại bài toán”. Thay vì giữ nguyên phương án cũ, đội ngũ kỹ thuật của Seico đã cùng khách hàng rà soát lại toàn bộ các yếu tố thực tế của công trình:

• Nội lực thực tế của kết cấu
• Khối lượng thép sử dụng
• Điều kiện thi công tại công trường
• Đặc điểm thời tiết và địa hình
• Chi phí vận hành tổng thể, không chỉ riêng chi phí vật liệu

Seico cùng khách hàng “làm lại bài toán”

Từ quá trình đánh giá này, Seico đề xuất chuyển sang phương án sử dụng hệ khung kèo thép nhẹ, được tối ưu theo đúng nội lực thực tế của công trình.

Các thay đổi chính gồm:

• Sử dụng kèo thép nhẹ tính toán theo nội lực thực
• Chuyển từ liên kết hàn sang liên kết bu lông tại hiện trường
• Tổ hợp cấu kiện ngay tại mặt đất thay vì phụ thuộc hoàn toàn vào cẩu lắp

Sử dụng kèo thép nhẹ tính toán theo nội lực thực

Giải pháp này giúp công trình vẫn đảm bảo yêu cầu kỹ thuật nhưng linh hoạt hơn rất nhiều trong thi công thực tế.

Kết quả đạt được: 

✔ Giảm 20% tổng khối lượng kết cấu thép: Giảm trực tiếp chi phí vật liệu và tối ưu hiệu quả đầu tư.

✔ Giảm phụ thuộc vào thiết bị cẩu: Nhờ cấu kiện nhẹ hơn, công nhân có thể thao tác và lắp dựng thủ công ở nhiều hạng mục.

✔ Thi công linh hoạt hơn trong điều kiện thời tiết bất lợi: Hạn chế hàn tại hiện trường, đặc biệt phù hợp với môi trường mưa ẩm kéo dài.

✔ Tối ưu chi phí vận chuyển: Cấu kiện gọn nhẹ giúp tăng tỷ lệ lấp đầy xe hàng, giảm số chuyến vận chuyển.

✔ Giảm chi phí tổng thể của dự án: Không chỉ tối ưu chi phí kết cấu thép mà còn giảm đáng kể chi phí thi công, vận hành và thiết bị hỗ trợ.

Giảm 20% tổng khối lượng kết cấu thép

Tối ưu kết cấu không chỉ là giảm thép

Một phương án hiệu quả không đơn thuần là “dùng ít vật liệu hơn”, mà là lựa chọn đúng giải pháp phù hợp với điều kiện thi công, vận hành và mục tiêu đầu tư thực tế.

Khách hàng và đội ngũ Seico đã cùng nhau đặt lại bài toán đúng cách

• Không mặc định phương án ban đầu là tối ưu
• Không chạy theo giải pháp “quen thuộc”
• Mà chọn giải pháp phù hợp với thực tế vận hành

Với Seico, mỗi dự án đều được tiếp cận từ góc độ tối ưu tổng thể:

• Đúng nhu cầu sử dụng
• Đúng điều kiện công trình
• Đúng bài toán chi phí dài hạn

Đó mới là giá trị bền vững của một giải pháp kết cấu hiệu quả.

SEICO - Chuẩn chất thép - Trọn niềm tin 

-------------------

SEICO STEEL

Website: http://seico.vn

 Email: hnsales@seico.vn

 YouTube: www.youtube.com/@SEICOJSC

 LinkedIn: SEICO JSC trên LinkedIn

Progress update on the structural steel package at the Core5 Hai Phong project – one of the modern, sustainability-oriented industrial developments at Nam Dinh Vu Industrial Park.

In Phase 2, the project is progressing on schedule, with SEICO’s structural steel works playing a critical role in shaping the main load-bearing framework and ensuring the overall quality of the development. Being entrusted with a high-standard project of this scale is a strong testament to SEICO’s execution capability, as well as its proven reputation in meeting stringent technical requirements from international developers.

SEICO x Core5 Hai Phong – Phase 2 at Nam Dinh Vu Industrial Park

Core5 Hai Phong Phase 2 stands out for its flexible design approach, operational efficiency, and commitment to sustainable development. These characteristics set high demands on the structural steel solutions:

• The integration of mezzanine floors within factory designs maximizes usable space, requiring precise structural calculations to ensure load capacity, stability, and long-term operational flexibility.
• The centralized Service & Utilities Hub calls for consistency and durability across all structural components, supporting efficient operations and future scalability.
• Compliance with LEED Certified standards imposes strict requirements on materials, engineering practices, and construction processes, contributing to reduced environmental impact and improved energy performance.

SEICO x Core5 Hai Phong – Phase 2 at Nam Dinh Vu Industrial Park

Within this context, SEICO goes beyond the role of a conventional contractor. The company actively contributes to optimizing structural steel solutions—from detailed design and fabrication to on-site erection—while maintaining strict control over quality, safety, and progress at every stage.

SEICO x Core5 Hai Phong – Phase 2 at Nam Dinh Vu Industrial Park

Leveraging extensive experience in large-scale industrial projects, SEICO delivers structural solutions that balance technical excellence, cost efficiency, and sustainability. These efforts help establish a solid foundation for efficient operations and long-term value, aligning with the project’s ESG objectives.

SEICO x Core5 Hai Phong – Phase 2 at Nam Dinh Vu Industrial Park

Being selected for the Core5 Hai Phong project once again affirms SEICO’s strategic direction: continuously enhancing capabilities, strengthening its position in the steel structure industry, and serving as a trusted partner for high-quality industrial developments in Vietnam.

SEICO - True Steel - Complete Trust 

-------------------

SEICO STEEL

Website: http://seico.vn

 Email: hnsales@seico.vn

 YouTube: www.youtube.com/@SEICOJSC

 LinkedIn: SEICO JSC trên LinkedIn